Part 1: the transformation
of the concept of knowledge
The Rise of the Era of Intellectual Technologies
INTRODUCTION
Contemporary views on artificial intelligence (AI) are polarized: on one hand, there are expectations for the emergence of Strong AI; on the other, a skeptical attitude regards it as merely another iteration of information technology. This state of affairs necessitates a systematic analysis of the nature of the observed changes and the development of appropriate approaches to address them.
Such uncertainty is characteristic of phase-based technological transitions, a fact confirmed by the experience of the previous transformation associated with the rise of the digital era. Drawing historical parallels and analyzing structural analogies enables the development of a more precise approach to understanding the current situation.
This work is based on the long-term experience of a group of authors, synthesizing insights from philosophical-methodological seminars, teaching, and practical activities in creating and implementing information and intellectual systems, as well as executing corporate digital transformation projects across various industries and countries. The purpose of this paper is to propose a theoretical foundation for analyzing the ongoing changes. The main objective is not to provide definitive forecasts, but to form an adequate conceptual and theoretical apparatus. This apparatus is intended to ensure a correct problematization—the posing of the right questions about the nature of the new phenomenon and its consequences, which, in turn, is a necessary condition for establishing a future program of work in research and practical development.
Part 1: the transformation
of the concept of knowledge
The Rise of the Era of Intellectual Technologies
AGES
Pre-Literate (Oral) Age (until ~3500 BCE)
An age in which knowledge is entirely interiorized within the individual and collective memory. The reproduction of activity and norms occurs exclusively through "natural transmission"—oral communication, rituals, and direct imitation. The key and sole technology for preserving and transmitting knowledge is human language and speech. The structures of everyday life are local, mythological, and cyclical.
Agrarian-Literate (Pre-Industrial) Age (~3500 BCE – ~1750 CE)
The advent of writing marks the first great technologization of memory. Knowledge begins to be exteriorized (moved outside) onto physical media (clay, papyrus, parchment, paper). This allows for the creation of "artificial" mechanisms of reproduction—culture as a repository of standards (sacred texts, laws, chronicles). However, knowledge remains elitist, and the speed of manual copying limits its dissemination. The structures of everyday life are subordinated to the agrarian rhythm.
Industrial Age (~1750 – ~1950)
Characterized by the onset of the technologization of physical operations and energy. "Know-how" is massively exteriorized through instructions, blueprints, and patents. The technologies include machines and assembly lines, and the method is operationalization (Taylorism). Systems for the mass reproduction of norms and knowledge emerge and develop, including universal education, newspapers, and ideologies. The structures of everyday life become linear, subordinated to the industrial rhythm, and urbanization and a clear division of labor occur.
Information (Post-Industrial) Age (~1950 – ~2020s)
The stage of technologizing information work. The procedures for storing, processing, and transmitting data have become digital and practically instantaneous. Data is processed by software, not "in the head" of a person. The reproduction of knowledge is radically accelerated through digital networks, creating a gap between the rate of new knowledge creation and its dissemination and reproduction. The structures of everyday life are defined by the collapse of the physical space of activity, the emergence of virtual worlds, and the rise of platform business models.
Intellectual (Post-Information) Age (~2020s – ...)
The nascent age, defined by the technologization of intellectual functions. Key technologies (LLMs, generative AI) operate not with data, but directly with information and, potentially, with knowledge. The reproduction of activity begins to be technologized, occurring no longer on a "human substrate". The structures of everyday life are transforming into a world of agent-based systems, where an intellectual agent mediates interaction with reality, and following the space of activity, time itself "collapses".
To systematically analyze the current transformation, an adequate theoretical foundation is necessary. The first step in constructing it is to define timeframes and identify key periods, each characterized by a dominant mode of working with knowledge, technologies, and, consequently, unique structures of everyday life. Such a historical perspective allows for the identification of patterns in phase-based technological transitions and a more precise determination of the nature and scale of the changes occurring today.
KNOWLEDGE
To adequately analyze the critical aspects of the transitional moments between ages, it is necessary to introduce the concept of knowledge and distinguish it from related concepts, such as "data" and "information."
In modern epistemology and knowledge management theory, knowledge is defined as information embedded in context and experience, which enables the making of justified judgments and effective decisions. Unlike information (which is organized data), knowledge implies understanding, interpretation, and the ability to apply it.
Types of Knowledge
For the purposes of this analysis, two independent distinctions between types of knowledge are key:
Distinction by degree of formalization:
Explicit knowledge
Knowledge that can be easily formalized, codified, stored on external media, and transmitted in the form of data, texts, or formulas.
Tacit knowledge
Practical, often intuitive knowledge based on personal experience, which is difficult or impossible to fully formalize and convey in words. It is manifested in action and mastery.
Distinction by content
Declarative knowledge ("know-what")
Knowledge of facts, objects, and theories. It answers the question, "What is...?"
Procedural knowledge ("know-how")
Knowledge of how to perform specific actions, skills, and methods. It answers the question, "How to...?"
These distinctions intersect: for example, a craftsman’s procedural knowledge (how to make a violin) is tacit but can be partially externalized into explicit declarative knowledge (an instruction manual or a blueprint).
The Processes of Working with Knowledge
The processes of working with knowledge, which transform from one age to the next, can be systematized by drawing on fundamental epistemological concepts. Below is a three-stage structure of the cognitive process, which traces its lineage from Kant to Popper:
This stage involves acquiring primary experience and collecting "raw" data from the world. In the pre-literate age, this process was limited to individual sensory experience. The invention of writing made it possible to accumulate and transmit the observations of others. Modern sensors and global networks now provide access to observations on a planetary scale in real time.
Observation
This process involves structuring data with the aid of existing models, concepts, and theories. It is the stage of transforming the chaos of data into meaningful information and formulating hypotheses. While this process was once entirely internalized within human consciousness, technologies (from mathematics to computer modeling) allow it to be externalized, creating increasingly complex conceptual frameworks.
Conceptualization
This stage involves testing the created hypotheses and models for their robustness. The scientific method, according to Karl Popper, consists not in confirming (verifying) theories, but in constantly attempting to refute (falsify) them. The technologies of each age radically change the speed and scale of this process, from isolated experiments to modern simulations and big data analysis, which enable the testing of millions of hypotheses.
Verification/Falsification
It is worth noting that the processes described above are very approximate and, in their current form, cannot be used for technological implementation and operationalization.
The "Data - Information - Knowledge" Hierarchy
For further analysis, it is important to clearly distinguish these concepts, which form a hierarchical structure known as the DIKW Pyramid:
Data
These are raw, unprocessed, and unorganized facts, symbols, and signals. In themselves, they carry no meaning or context. Typical media for data in different ages have been sound waves (speech), physical media (clay tablets, paper), and digital signals (electrical impulses, radio waves).
Information
This is data that has been processed, organized, and structured. Information acquires context and answers the questions "Who?", "What?", "Where?", and "When?".
Knowledge
This refers to information that has been comprehended, analyzed, and integrated with existing experience. Knowledge allows one to draw conclusions, make predictions, and make decisions. It answers the question "how?".
The technologies of each age radically change the methods and speed of the transformations that link data, information, and knowledge. While all previous transitions occurred within human consciousness, information technologies have made it possible to externalize the transition from data to information, and intellectual technologies are now beginning to externalize the transition from information to knowledge.
Language as a Primary Technology
At the foundation of the entire hierarchy and all processes of working with knowledge lies language. It should be regarded as the fundamental, primary technology that enables the very transition from subjective experience to objectified information.
Language is the operating system of consciousness, providing the code (words, grammar) to package the continuous stream of sensory data into discrete, transmissible units. Without language, the majority of data remains a personal, incommunicable experience. It is language that transforms raw sensory perception into a universally shared concept that can be conveyed, discussed, and used as a basis for building collective knowledge. Thus, any analysis of the transformation of knowledge must begin by acknowledging language as the first and most crucial technology of reproduction.
In the contemporary understanding of the relationship between language and thought, several contentious points still require clarification, which could have a profound impact on all theories and practices related to knowledge.
Dilemma #1
Does language merely give form to internal processes, as stated above, or is there no thought outside of language?
Dilemma #2
Does language describe the world, or does it construct an artificial model of the world—in effect, constructing the world itself?
Dilemma #3
What do we classify as languages? There are natural, everyday languages that we speak. And there are artificial languages, designed to objectify content and move away from the ambiguity and noise of natural language. The language of mathematics can be considered an artificial language. The field concerning the multiplicity of language categories has not been sufficiently developed or conceptualized at present.
The Conceptual Apparatus of Knowledge in Different Ages
In different ages, different structures underlie the concept of knowledge:
An age without writing, where there was only oral text transmitted through communication in a given language, and procedural knowledge was transmitted through other complementary processes like demonstration, explanation, and so on. In that era, data consisted of sounds—specific sound waves.
Pre-Literate Age
The interpretation of sounds into information—words and sentences, or content—occurred "in the head" of a person. Language acquisition—the transmission of the technology for interpreting sounds into content—was also passed on only through direct generational interaction. The technology for converting content into knowledge—adding meaning to content, or understanding—was transmitted in the same way.
Let’s convert this statement to a more formalized description:
Sound = hearing (Sound wave) 
Text = speech (Sound, Language) 
Information = understanding (Text, Context) 
Knowledge = Understanding (Information, 
Knowledge (i-1), 
Understanding_Techniques, 
Concepts) 
Action = Decision (Knowledge, Goals, Tools)
know-what = understanding1(information) 
know-how = understanding2(demonstration) ???
Info = f (data)
Data = interpretation (recognition (signals), interpreter) 
Info = understanding1(Data, 
Context, techniques_of_understanding1) 
Knowledge = understanding2(Info, 
Context, 
techniques_of_understanding2)
signals " translation into language1 " communication text " translation from language2 " information " understanding " knowledge
The hypotheses stated above require a systematic breakdown of the process into operations, operators, and intermediate results of transformations in order to isolate the operations and transformation procedures, and to form the chain and process of creating, transforming, and using knowledge. 
In other words, before the advent of writing, the only way to transmit and preserve knowledge was through oral speech and demonstration. Language was already a carrier of information, but the methods and technologies for processing—converting sound waves (data) into content (language)—were interiorized within the human being.
Writing a text on a physical medium was added to the previous category, which structurally changed the processes of working with knowledge. At this point, additional concepts can be introduced: data and information. That is, a text contains a set of symbols—this can be called data. To convert data into information, specific data processing procedures (reading) must be performed (at that time, this was done by a person "in their head"). Then, for information to become knowledge, additional information processing procedures (understanding) must be carried out, after which the knowledge is interiorized, or appropriated, by a specific person. Why understanding? Even if someone today were to read the inscriptions on the Rosetta Stone, it would be a set of meaningless sentences; the content would be straightforward, but the meaning would not (if necessary, a distinction between the concepts of "content" and "meaning" can be provided).
Pre-Industrial Age (Agrarian-Literate)
Image = vision (light_waves_reflected_from_the_object (inscription)) 
Text = Reading (Image, Language) 
Information = understanding (Text, Context) 
Knowledge = Understanding (Information, Knowledge (i-1), 
Und_Techniques, Concepts) 
Action = Decision (Knowledge, Goals, Tools)
The difference from speech, as well as the additional operations and procedures, is highlighted.
Information Age
The structure of working with knowledge changes once again. The key transformation is the technologization of data storage, processing, and transmission. Data virtualization occurs: an additional layer is added. The physical medium (a hard drive, a microchip) now stores not the sign itself (a letter, an image), but its digital code—a "sign of a sign", which is accessible for interpretation only by technical means. The machine performs the procedure of translating this physical data (electrical impulses) into virtual data, which is then synthesized for human recognition (an image on a screen, sound from speakers). Although the apparatus for processing virtual data into information (understanding) largely remains with the human, this virtualization opens up new possibilities. Some functions for converting data into information, for a limited set of scenarios, can be offloaded to the machine in the form of algorithms written by a human. This, combined with digital networks, unlocks a new level of speed in information dissemination.
Data transformation process in the digital age:
Data (physical) = Electrical impulse / Magnetic charge
Data (virtual) = Software_driver(Data_phys) 
Information = Software_algorithm(Data_virt) 
OR Human_understanding(Data_virt, Context) 
Knowledge = Human_understanding(Information,
Knowledge(i-1), Und_Techniques)
Thus, the fundamental shift is that the procedure of transforming data into information is partially exteriorized and technologized, but the creation of knowledge from information still remains predominantly a human prerogative.
Intellectual Age
In this nascent era, a fundamental shift is occurring: it is no longer data that is being technologized, but information itself and, potentially, knowledge. While information systems learned to operate on data (reading, storing, transmitting), intellectual systems based on large language models (LLMs) and generative AI are beginning to perform operations that were previously the exclusive domain of human consciousness. Relational databases are being replaced by new carriers, such as vector representations, which encode not data, but the semantic proximity of concepts. This allows for fundamentally new operations on information itself.
Information transformation process in the intellectual age:
Information₂ = f(AI)[Information₁] 
Knowledge = f(human)[Information₂]
The fundamental shift is that the intellectual system, f (AI), is capable of independently transforming one piece of information into another (e.g., summarizing, translating, synthesizing) by applying context and semantic connections through its mathematical apparatus. The human, f (human), still makes the final transition to knowledge, but does so based not on raw information, but on the product of intellectual processing. This is the beginning of the technologization of thought.
Conclusion
Theses and an Introduction to the Work Program
Large language models (LLMs) and data vectorization are knowledge management technologies that belong to a new era. They are a  research subject:
  1. To build a conceptual apparatus for "data-information-knowledge," including its processes, operations, materials, functions, etc., resulting from a systematic analysis of the transformation of knowledge structures from one era to another.
  2. To build and determine the influence and transformation of knowledge management structures with the emergence of the technology class comprising LLMs, generative AI, and vector data representation.
The very concept of "knowledge" and the processes of working with it change with each era. As was shown in the analysis of the eras, the transition from an oral culture to a written one, and then to an informational one, fundamentally changed what was considered knowledge and how it was handled. Whereas in the pre-literate era, knowledge was inseparable from its human carrier, writing allowed it to be exteriorized, and the digital era technologized operations with data, making information globally accessible.
The processes of knowledge acquisition and accumulation also evolve from one era to the next. Each phase transition transformed the fundamental processes of working with knowledge. The oral era relied on socialization and the transmission of tacit knowledge. Writing spurred on externalization, and the information age, with its databases and networks, took the process of combining explicit knowledge to a new level.
In the intellectual era, the structure and concept of "knowledge," as well as the procedures for working with it, will change. By analogy with previous transitions, the nascent intellectual era is redefining the very essence of the cognitive process. If technologies previously automated work with data, they are now beginning to automate the transition from information to knowledge by technologizing the cognitive functions of synthesis and generalization.
The current conceptual apparatus is insufficient for designing the transition to the intellectual era. The analysis conducted in the "KNOWLEDGE" section (distinguishing between types of knowledge, the DIKW hierarchy, transformation formulas) shows that the operations and processes underlying the concept of "knowledge" are complex and multifaceted. However, they have not yet been consolidated into a single, rigorous conceptual apparatus that would allow for an adequate description and, more importantly, the design of new intellectual systems.
Fundamental questions about the nature of language remain unresolved. As was noted, language is the primary technology underlying all work with knowledge. However, key dilemmas (whether language describes the world or constructs it, what constitutes thought without language) remain open. Without a deeper understanding of these issues, any theory of the technologization of knowledge will be incomplete, and our forecasts will be limited.
Theses and Programs for Further Work
The analysis presented shows that the technologies of the new intellectual era, such as large language models (LLMs) and data vectorization, are not merely tools but objects that require fundamental research. Based on the conclusions above, the following work program is formulated, aimed at establishing a solid theoretical and practical foundation for the upcoming era.
The primary task is to develop a rigorous conceptual framework that describes the structure and processes of working with knowledge. This includes:
  • Formalizing the "data — information—knowledge" hierarchy.
  • A systematic description of the transformation operations and procedures at each level (e.g., recognition, interpretation, understanding, synthesis).
  • Defining the roles and functions of various elements, such as material, carrier, tool, context, and purpose, in the process of creating and applying knowledge. The methodological basis is a systematic analysis of the transformation of these structures from one era to another.
Direction 1: Building an Ontology of Knowledge
Direction 2: Analysis of the Transformational Impact of Intellectual Technologies.
It is necessary to investigate how specific technologies, such as large language models (LLMs), generative AI, and vector representations, alter the existing structures of knowledge processing. This includes:
  • Defining the new types of operations that become possible thanks to these technologies.
  • Analyzing the transformation of cognitive processes (observation, conceptualization, verification).
  • Designing new models of interaction between humans and intellectual agents in the processes of creating and using knowledge.
Let’s Connect
If my Why resonates with you, let's get in touch via LinkedIn